[1] Adler's note is 'cf. Diogenes Laertius 7.82', because D.L. lists there a total of five Stoic aporoi logoi ("insoluble arguments") and seems -- though the text may be faulty -- to supply examples of the two the Suda mentions here. For the Nobody, see also D.L. 7.198: eight volumes on it attributed to Chrysippus. In 7.82 D.L. explains it thus: "Nobody is an argument whose major premiss consists of an indefinite and a definite clause, with a minor premiss and a conclusion -- for instance, if anyone is here, he is not in Rhodes, but there is someone here, so there is nobody in Rhodes". The Heap-fallacy or Sorites (attributed in D.L. 2.108 to Euboulides of Miletus), addressing the problem of gradualism, is illustrated thus in 7.82: "it cannot be that if two is few, three is not so likewise, nor that if two or three are few, four is not so; and on on up to ten; two is few, and so is ten". See note 6 at epsilon 2766.
[2] Likewise already in Hesychius omicron1904. *ou)/tis is used in epic and poetry, but ou)dei/s is regular in prose.
[3] Similar note in other lexica; cf. Homer, Odyssey 9.366 (web address 1), where Odysseus deceives the Cyclops by telling him that his name is Outis.
[4] Sophocles, Ajax 725-7 (web address 2), with scholion. The singular ou)/tis refers to multiple men, and is accompanied by the plural participle a)pokalou=ntes.