Same entry, according to Adler, in the Ambrosian Lexicon (4). The headword in this form is attested only in lexicography, and has no self-evident meaning; note, however, that the parallel entry in ps.-Zonaras (p. 416) gives the lemma as ga/mboros h)\ ga/mmoros -- the latter being presumably a variant of ga/moros or gh/moros. The gloss (cf. under alpha 1664) does seem diametrically opposed to this interpretation, however.