[(?)Meaning he/she/it] has been worked out.
*)ekpera=nai: e)kpepo/nhtai.
Entry lacking, Adler reports, in mss GTFV, a marginal addition in A, and placed earlier in G.
Since the headword is the aorist active infinitive of the verb
e)kperai/nw , the gloss is obviously a mismatch for it. A possible explanation is that
e)kpera=nai, like
pera=nai (
pi 1030), is unglossed, leaving
e)pepo/nhtai as another unglossed entry (albeit slightly out of alphabetical order) in its own right. The latter might be quoted from
Xenophon,
Cyropaedia 8.2.5, though there are other possibilities.
No. of records found: 1
Page 1