Same entry in the derivative ps.-Zonaras; a comparable one (Adler reports) in the unedited Laurentianus 59.16; and see especially Hesychius epsilon7723, where the present glossing word (with another, a)pe/ptusen) is applied to the lemma e)/yucen. The Suda's e)/yuren, otherwise unattested, is thus surely a mistake.
The authentic headword must be quoted from somewhere, perhaps Josephus (Jewish War 2.331 or 5.472).