Apparently the main point of this entry is to differentiate similar forms of the verbs pai/zw ('play') and pe/kw ('card'), but also to explicate the rare pluperfect personal ending -ein. This is usually taken by modern grammars as an first-person or third-person singular ending, but it is unclear whether the lexicographer understands it that way. The ending of the first gloss, e)nepai/xqhn, is first-person singular, whereas the second gloss, e)pepe/xeisan, is third-person plural. There is much disagreement in the manuscipts, however, over the forms of these words. Adler compares three entries in the unedited Ambrosian Lexicon (1679-80 and 1576).
cf. epsilon 2019, epsilon 2112 and pi 918.
[1] Here an aorist passive form is used to gloss a pluperfect active.