Adler cites Glossae in Psalmos in relation to this entry, perhaps with reference to Psalm 118.126 LXX, dieske/dasan to\n no/mon sou.
[1] = Synagoge delta266, Photius delta550, although Theodoridis obelizes the headword in his edition of Photius, on the basis of Hesychius delta1662 where the headword dieskeuasme/non ('formed') appears with the identical gloss. The existing gloss would be much more appropriate for this headword. The transmitted headword dieskedasme/non occurs in (e.g.) Aristotle, De audibilibus 801b; Proclus, In Platonis Parmenidem 71.15; Gregory of Nyssa, De virginitate 6.2; Hippocrates, De aeris aquis locis 8 and Epidemiae 4.1.14; Libanius, Epistles 1426.2. In none of these passages, is the gloss offered here appropriate.
[2] Probably a version of what survives in Hesychius epsilon1352 under the headword e)ske/dase and in Synagoge alpha773 under the headword a)peske/dase (hence alpha 3058). For the Suda's combination of headword and gloss see ps.-Zonaras 550 (for which Adler cites Anecdota graeca 2.492.30 Cramer as a parallel), and cf. delta 755. The headword offered here, dieske/dase, is aorist active indicative, third person singular, from the same verb as the primary headword. It may be a corruption of one of the headwords preserved in the earlier lexica [WH], but if quoted from somewhere it is perhaps from [DW] Xenophon, Hellenica 4.1.19, or (AI) Plutarch, Sulla 13.4. But there are numerous other possibilities.