The headword is actually (feminine nominative) plural, hard to reproduce in translation.
[1] Likewise or similarly in other lexica; and cf. the scholia to Homer, Iliad 5.499, where the word occurs (accusative plural).
[2] Greek Anthology 6.102.3 (Philip), the fruit farmer Damon's dedication; cf. Gow and Page (vol. I, 308-309), (vol. II, 341-342), and further extracts from this epigram at gamma 192 and sigma 400. The mh=lon that Damon dedicates here could be an apple or any tree fruit in general (cf. LSJ s.v. mh=lon2 at web address 1), but apples are neither downy nor particularly fragrant, whereas unripe quinces are indeed fuzzy and have a pungent floral aroma after ripening; cf. Gow and Page (vol. II, 341) and Paton (352-355).
[3] Aeschylus fr. 336.
[4] There seems to be a double dose of confusion here. Hippocrates uses the word a)/xnh only in the sense of fine threads of lint; and indeed in the second of the Suda's two purported quotations other lexica do have "lint" (li/nou), not "hunger" (limou=). But that still leaves the problem of the first quotation. One might diagnose confusion here between a)/xnh and a)/kos, "cure/remedy". See Epidemiai 6.4.18 (akos of sleep); de affectionibus 47 (akos of hunger).