The first part of this entry is also in Photius, where however the headword itself, an aorist infinitive, is not the Suda's a)nablustwnh=sai (repeated later in the entry) but a)nablusqwnh=sai.
[1] Eupolis fr. 105 Kock, now 119 K.-A.
[2] The transmitted participle paro/ntes at the end of this sentence makes no obvious sense. Theodoridis on Photius (Lexicon alpha1414) lists, without adopting, three suggested emendations, one of them pai/zontes.